National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
NCI Home Cancer Topics Clinical Trials Cancer Statistics Research & Funding News About NCI
Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment and Counseling (PDQ®)
Health Professional VersionLast Modified: 10/06/2009



Purpose






Introduction






Cancer Risk Assessment and Counseling






Components of the Risk Assessment Process






Education and Counseling About Risk/Risk Communication






The Option of Genetic Testing






Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications






Get More Information From NCI







Changes to This Summary (10/06/2009)






More Information



Page Options
Print This Page  Print This Page
Print This Document  Print Entire Document
View Entire Document  View Entire Document
E-Mail This Document  E-Mail This Document
Quick Links
Director's Corner

Dictionary of Cancer Terms

NCI Drug Dictionary

Funding Opportunities

NCI Publications

Advisory Boards and Groups

Science Serving People

Español
Quit Smoking Today
NCI Highlights
Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research

The Nation's Investment in Cancer Research FY 2010

Report to Nation Finds Declines in Cancer Incidence, Death Rates
Changes to This Summary (10/06/2009)

The PDQ cancer information summaries are reviewed regularly and updated as new information becomes available. This section describes the latest changes made to this summary as of the date above.

Cancer Risk Assessment and Counseling

Added text to state that knowledge deficits in hereditary cancer syndromes and concerns about genetic discrimination influence provider referral patterns for genetic counseling and that a survey in California showed that a majority of providers were unable to identify cases appropriate for referral and were unaware of existing federal and state protective laws (cited Lowstuter et al. as reference 26).

Education and Counseling About Risk/Risk Communication

Added text about a study that examined the use of two different visual aids to communicate breast cancer risk. Overall, there were no differences in improved accuracy of risk perception between women who received feedback via a bar graph alone or a bar graph plus a frequency diagram, but among women who inaccurately perceived very high risk at baseline, the group receiving both visual aids showed greater improvement in accuracy (cited Ghosh et al. as reference 5).

The Option of Genetic Testing

Added text about a study that examined consumer and physician awareness of nutrigenomic testing in Michigan, Oregon, and Utah, that found those who had higher incomes, greater education, and increasing age were more aware of nutrigenomic tests (cited Goddard et al. as reference 29).

Back to TopBack to Top

< Previous Section  |  Next Section >


A Service of the National Cancer Institute
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health USA.gov